What the Archbishop actually said
“Archbishop says Nativity a myth !”
screamed at least one of the broadsheet newspapers a few days before
Christmas. Leaving aside the fact that the word “myth” is a much more positive
noun than a sub-editor would allow, this
non-story tells us a lot about a sad lack of bible knowledge and the desire to
savage Rowan Williams at every opportunity.
So what was it all about ? It all arose from an interview with the
Archbishop by Simon Mayo on Radio 5 Live (by definition unscripted). In it
Rowan was asked whether he believed in the Three Kings, and their names and the
fact that one of them was black. He
rightly pointed out that Matthew’s Gospel does not tell us there were three, nor
how many there were (though there are three gifts of course), nor their names
or ethnic origin – more than that they were not Kings. He went on to say that much that we sing of
in our Carols or see depicted in Nativity Plays or on Cards is an elaboration
of the story, folk tales and myths created around it. There is no harm in
these, provided we recognise them as such.
That is what he said – perfectly biblical and correct.
So, if they were not
Kings, then who were these men ? The Archbishop reminded his questioner that
Matthew calls them Magi, astrologers,
perhaps from Persia. Their journey to
seek and worship the infant Christ is a powerful symbol of the Christian
conviction that the God we meet uniquely incarnate in Jesus is not only the
fulfilment of Old Testament law and prophets (a major theme in Matthew’s Gospel
) but the fulfilment of the longing and desiring of those far beyond the
religion of Israel. He is the goal of
their spiritual searching – significantly they give up the tools of their profession
to Jesus and worship him. The God they
sought in strange and crooked byways, they now recognise in this child. From then on they are different and
changed.
For us this is a basic
principle of mission – that our boundaries, like those of the Holy Family in
the Stable are low enough to welcome the seeker, the stranger, the person who
is culturally and spiritually different from us, and that our conviction is
that Christ we proclaim is not our possession but for all.
Roger Clarke
January
2008