Eco-Congregation

 

          In the month when St Bridget’s receives its Eco-congregation Award, the Rector writes on  environmental concerns from a Christian perspective.

 

Ten years or so ago the "eco-warriors" turned up at Manchester Airport.  You may recall from the TV and other media reports that "Swampy" and his friends, occupied ancient woodland that was in the path of the excavations for the second runway, and attempted to prevent the work continuing. There were tussles with the Airport security staff and Police, and eventually and inevitably the protestors went their way, the trees were felled and the tarmac laid.  But their point was made, and similar protests in the 1990s ensured that environmental issues became part of our consciousness rather more than they had in the past.

 

Whatever you and I may think of the rights and wrongs of particular cases (and, as a Priest working in a Parish very near the Airport, I was very aware of the economic necessity of airport expansion for Manchester), we cannot avoid "green" issues any more.

 

In this Parish over the last few years the work of Sally Cashen and the "Eco-congregation" team have raised  our consciousness of environmental and conservation issues to the extent that we have now been formally recognized by the ecumenical  "Eco-congregation" movement, and will be receiving  an "Eco-congregation" award (the first in Chester Diocese).  We have become more aware of how we can live more eco-friendly life-styles, we have provided practical resources to do this, we have developed our own conservation work (eg in the Churchyard) and have been involved in learning through House groups and more formal teaching. Many of us, myself included, have been challenged about issues of recycling and sustainability – slowly our attitudes and our lives have changed. 

 

But what are the roots of our environmental concerns ?  Is it simply a matter of "jumping on the bandwagon", of trying to be "relevant" or "trendy", or is there a Christian origin to what we do, based on Scripture and tradition ?  Ought we not (some might say) to be concentrating on "spiritual" things rather than things ephemeral ?

 

It's important to challenge such views when we hear them, and to do so in the knowledge of the implications of our faith. For the Christian there is no separation between the physical and the spiritual, to the detriment of either.

 

The Genesis stories for example (the poetry of creation – giving us the "why" just as Science give us the "how") affirm the goodness of Creation. Again and again as things come into being the writer affirms how in the eyes of God they are "very good". If the Creator God calls them good, we should do so also. Every level of creation, throughout the "six days" is called good, and is good in itself, long before humanity appears on the scene. These things matter to God in themselves, not simply because they are useful to us.  How much more is that so when, in the light of the theory of Evolution,  we realize how many millions of years were required for things to come into being.            

 

This surely means that issues of care for the environment and for the animal creation are not optional for Christians but part and parcel of our faith in a Creator God.  It means that what are called "animal rights" issues are issues we cannot avoid, nor are the specific issues of the use of animals in research or of hunting.  To be sure, there are no easy answers here, and there needs to be much debate – but wherever we stand, we are not able to sidestep the issues as irrelevant – they too are spiritual matters.

 

As we read on in the Genesis stories our obligations become even clearer. As humanity is brought into being at the end of the process there is the command to "rule over" the earth,  and "subdue" it.  This can sound as if we are given carte-blanche to do what we like, but we need to understand that the context and meaning of those words is one of responsibility and authority. Men and women bearing the image of God, are given a delegated authority to be his stewards of creation – we are answerable to God for what we do, and to  

abuse the creation is to disfigure something  of his image in us. In the same way, the call to "subdue" has the sense of bringing into order – just as in the second creation story the animals are brought to Adam to be named, and creation is made intelligible.

 

All this can be drawn from a single Chapter of the Old Testament – a powerful sign of the goodness of Creation and of our obligations towards it. Christians go even further, acknowledging that God is intimately bound up with his creation and revealed in it, above all in the flesh of Jesus – for the Creator becomes incarnate.  From that flows the conviction that the Sacraments are outward signs and vessels of God's grace and presence to us. There is no dichotomy between creation and the things of the Spirit – as Archbishop William Temple once famously said, "Christianity is the most material of religions".

 

As an eco-congregation and as individuals we have a long way to go (I know I have), but we have made a good beginning, and we know that we cannot turn back. To care for the earth and all that is in it, is no option, but essential to our faith and our mission.

 

Roger Clarke

November 2006

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­